Feedback

7802-001

This is a very interesting annotated bibliography, Sophie, with some excellent entries. It is mainly well written and presented, and certainly connects well to your stated aims and interests. I’m certainly looking forward to seeing what comes next.

Some of the entries on the first page of the annotated bibliography could have been more successfully descriptive of the project and sometimes you have omitted to say what the main thrust of the academic argument is in relation to academic sources (see Crawford). However, some of the landscape entries are very good and certainly the latter part of your submission is generally stronger. You are certainly able to say where items are more or less useful for you.

Keep up the good work but remember to aim to capture, in brief, the important points of your reading, and remember to analyse them critically.